Dear, @maikwhat

On the top of the Tab you can see the Bars. There is a little + and - besides it. Here you can increase the bars to 16. You don't have to wipe everything with new pattern if you dont want to, just if you want to start completely from scratch

All bst,
D

Hey Sandeep,

I just reached out to you. Hope this fixes your issue!

Best,d

Dear @Jean-Michel

Sorry, right now there isn't a "demo" or evaluation version of PercX.

Greets,
Dominik

Dear @kdubb

Is there a way to record to multiple tracks simultaneously with PercX? To MIDI and to audio tracks at the same time like you can do with Breaktweaker?

Yes, you can "record" different tracks out of PercX (OUTPUT: "Main" select other channels). You can send each kits track with the Multi-Channel-Output directly into your DAW. (You maybe will have to look up how multi-channels work in your DAW).

Apart from that there is no way of getting MIDI out of PercX........, yet! (but lets see.)

Hope this helps a bit,
Best,
d

Dear Eddie!

Yes, Catalina is making some troubles with the installer. This is no grave problem and can be fixed easily!

You just have to right click on the installer, and then choose Open from the context menu

Here is a thread that also replies to this topic:
https://forum.auddict.com/topic/68/catalina-support-you-should-have-a-notice-before-purchasing/4

Best regards and enjoy PercX!,
d

dear @rikademus

You can do it via "swinging" the grid. You have to turn the little white bar up till it matches you desired amount. You can then quantize the notes to the grid with the Quantize Button (You have to turn it up to full for 100% quantization)

This works for single tracks, but also for the whole kit if you select all tracks at once.

Enjoy
d

hi @Prophet

Just to make sure. You can route the single tracks to different outputs into your DAW in the MIX page.

How to get a hold of this this channels depends on your DAW and you probably have to look that up in your DAWs manual. But this obviously is an one-MIDI-in, many-out approach. If you want a seperate-MIDI in approach there isn't a way around creating many instances, as far as i know.
best,d

インストールしてしまえば、DAWでVSTプラグインとして使えるようになるはずです。

translation:

I want to be able to use it in VST.

Oh, it is an VST already :), after installing you should be able to use it as a VST plugin in your DAW.

Best d

Dear Graeme,

Normally an email with the receipt from fastspring should have been sent to your inbox. In this email you can find an activation link with which you can set a password for the Auddict Account to log in and download PercX. Didn't this email arrive in your inbox?

If you can't find it, i guess the best way is to create a support ticket on the bottom of the auddict.com/percx website.

Best!,d

Dear @rwear

Nope, i guess this is part of the design. As far as i know this implementation was a tradeoff between being able to include the effects in the mix at all, via an FX bus, or relinquishing one of the stereo outputs. (obviously this it not super beautiful, but mixing together 2 tracks if one really needs 8 tracks in an instance, should be quite possible + There is also the possibility to create a second instance of PercX, if one really needs the separation of outputs.)

Best,d

Dear @BoogieBear

This is unfortunately not possible. PercX' Engine uses an "internal" midi formatting to make its unique round-robin and preroll-awareness work.

Because of that the internal editors midi files, would have to be stripped of this this features if converted into "normal" midi files. If you would playback this files in "manual mode" this would sound quite different than the playback in PercX.

You can save each tracks patterns as a (internal)midi file, though, if you want to save a pattern and reuse it later, or on any other track.

Best,d